Home | Firm  Overview  | Practice Areas | Attorneys | Articles | News | F.A.Q.s | Contact | NewslettersClients

Our Firm
Vision Statement
Legal Practice Areas
Attorney Profiles
Paralegal Staff
Firm News/Client Alerts
Articles
Newsletters
Frequently Asked Questions
Contact Us

RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS CAN HELP EMPLOYERS
By Thomas N. Ryan, Esq.

The business environment today is marked by tenacious competition, unprecedented low unemployment and employee mobility. Restrictive covenants are a sound way for an employer to protect legitimate business interests and safeguard against unfair competition during this time of decreased employee loyalty.

A restrictive covenant is an agreement signed by an employee not to compete against the employer during or after leaving employment. These agreements are closely scrutinized by the courts because the courts view them as the antithesis of pen competition and a free marketplace. However, when restrictive covenants are properly drafted, they will be enforced by the courts under appropriate circumstances if they are "reasonable".

A reasonable covenant was defined by the New Jersey Supreme Court over 30 years ago in the case Solari Industries, Inc. v. Malady. The court found that a covenant is reasonable when: (1) it protects an employer from actual injury from unfair competition; (2) it imposes no undue hardship on the employee; and, (3) the covenant must not be injurious to the public interest. In reviewing covenants, the burden is on the employer who is moving to enforce the covenant.

The fundamental rule is an employer cannot prevent a former employee from competing against it unless the employee has signed an enforceable written covenant not to compete. The covenant must be reasonable both in duration and geographic scope. An employer does have a legitimate interest in protecting: (1) trade secrets; (2) confidential customer lists; (3) truly confidential information; (4) customer good will.

It should be noted that a covenant not to compete, negotiated in conjunction with the sale of a business, is more likely to be enforced than one tied to the termination of employment.

An employer may also have a protectable interest where the employee has a special skill or special knowledge that is not easily or promptly replaced. The Court will generally allow an employer protection for a reasonable time during which they can replace the employee and allow the new employee time to become competitive in that niche. For example, this may be the time period during which the new employee has the opportunity to acquire technical knowledge and/or establish a relationship with customers previously serviced by the departing employee. The employer must show that in such a circumstance the absence of protection would result in unfair competition during the time the employer trains an employee and arms him or her with customer knowledge.

Although the courts look to the facts to determine what is reasonable in terms of time, geographic area and scope of activity in a restrictive covenant, they also engage in applying a "blue pencil" to such agreements, meaning that the court may enforce, but modify the terms of the covenant. In such a case, the court may reduce the duration of a 2-year non-compete agreement to 1 year or 6 months. It may also limit the geographic scope to the geographic areas where the sales employee had customers or actually formulate a list of customers the employee is restrained from dealing with for a period of time.

In practical terms, where a sales rep working for an employer has had the training and opportunity to establish a relationship with certain customers, it is reasonable, if there is a signed restrictive covenant, to expect a court to keep that employee, after the termination of his employment, away from those customers for a reasonable period of time. This time period allows the new employee an opportunity to acquire knowledge and establish a relationship with those customers. In effect, when a court upholds a covenant, it levels the playing field.

Tom Ryan can be reached at tryan@lcrlaw.com or by phone at (973) 729-1880.
Thomas N. Ryan, partner, Laddey, Clark & Ryan
 

-- Thomas N. Ryan is a partner at Laddey, Clark & Ryan and maintains a specialty in labor and employment law. For more information on him and his practice, click on the Our Attorneys section of this website.

 

 


Return To Previous Page

Home | Firm  Overview  | Practice Areas | Attorneys | Staff | Articles | News | FAQs | Contact | NewslettersClients

© Copyright by: Laddey, Clark & Ryan, LLP.  2006                                                         60 Blue Heron Rd.  Sparta, NJ  07871 1.973.729.1880